Supreme Court Denies AI as Patent Inventors in Landmark Case

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court has declined to hear computer scientist Stephen Thaler's appeal against the US Patent and Trademark Office's refusal to issue patents for inventions created by his AI system. Thaler argued that AI is being used to innovate in various fields and that rejecting AI-generated patents "curtails our patent system's ability - and thwarts Congress's intent - to optimally stimulate innovation and technological progress." The lower court had ruled that patents can only be issued to human inventors and that Thaler's AI system could not be considered the legal creator of two inventions.
- Supreme Court Rejects Computer Scientist's Lawsuit Over AI-Generated Inventions Slashdot
- AI vs. Patent Law: U.S. Supreme Court Rejects AI-Generated Patents gizmochina
- US Supreme Court snubs that guy who wants AI recognized as patent inventors The Register
- AI Inventor and the Ethics Trap for US Patent Attorneys Patently-O
- View Full Coverage on Google News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
57%
222 → 95 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Slashdot