"NY Times Denies OpenAI's Hacking Claim in Copyright Dispute"

TL;DR Summary
The New York Times responded to OpenAI's claims of "hacking" ChatGPT, arguing that it was not hacking but rather prompting the AI to bypass paywalls and discover evidence of copyright infringement. The NYT's court filing revealed that ChatGPT users were using the tool to generate entire articles and bypass paywalls, prompting OpenAI to temporarily disable a feature that allowed access to content beyond the model's training dataset. The NYT's lawsuit accuses OpenAI and Microsoft of copyright infringement, with the NYT seeking to track the full extent of copyright infringement and prompting ChatGPT to discover evidence.
- NYT to OpenAI: No hacking here, just ChatGPT bypassing paywalls Ars Technica
- New York Times denies OpenAI's claims it HACKED their systems by using 'hired gun' to create misleading eviden Daily Mail
- Update on AI Business Valuation Resources
- New York Times denies OpenAI's 'hacking' claim in copyright fight Reuters
- NY Times Says OpenAI Is 'Grandstanding' In Dismissal Bid Law360
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
87%
721 → 95 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Ars Technica