Judge's Verdict Looms as Google Faces Monopoly Allegations in Ad Tech Trial

TL;DR Summary
The Department of Justice's trial against Google over its alleged ad tech monopoly concluded with closing arguments, where the DOJ accused Google of unfairly dominating three markets by controlling ad auctions and disadvantaging competitors. The DOJ argued that Google's practices harmed publishers, but the judge noted a lack of direct evidence from advertisers and questioned the absence of testimony on better competing products. Google's defense highlighted these gaps in the DOJ's case.
- DOJ wraps up ad tech trial: Google is “three times” a monopolist Ars Technica
- The ‘Rocket Docket’ Judge Who Will Decide the Fate of Google’s Ad Technology The New York Times
- What Judge Brinkema Zeroed In On During Closing Arguments In US v. Google AdExchanger
- Google Arguments Draw Skepticism From Judge in Ad Tech Case Bloomberg
- Google’s empire is under siege The Verge
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
79%
347 → 72 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Ars Technica