ChatGPT's Fake Case Citations Lead to Lawyer Fines

TL;DR Summary
Lawyers from the firm Levidow, Levidow, & Oberman were fined $5,000 and had their lawsuit dismissed after using ChatGPT to research court filings that cited six fake cases invented by the AI tool. The lawyers "abandoned their responsibilities" and "advocated for the fake cases and legal arguments" even after being informed that their citations were non-existent. The judge described the legal analysis in one of the fake cases as "gibberish." The lawyers are required to send letters to six real judges who were "falsely identified as the author of the fake" opinions cited in their legal filings.
- Lawyers have real bad day in court after citing fake cases made up by ChatGPT Ars Technica
- Two Lawyers Fined $5,000 for Lies Written by ChatGPT Gizmodo
- US lawyers fined $5,000 after including fake case citations generated by ChatGPT Engadget
- A law firm was fined $5,000 after one of its lawyers used ChatGPT to write a court brief riddled with fake case references Yahoo Finance
- Lawyers Who Prepped With ChatGPT Learn Their Fate Newser
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
90%
934 → 97 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Ars Technica