"Prince Harry's Security Dispute: A Royal's Battle for Protection and Justice"

Prince Harry demanded to know the person responsible for downgrading his UK police protection and lost his bid for taxpayer-funded UK security protection for his family, being required to pay out of pocket for security when visiting the UK. The court ruled that there was no unlawfulness in the initial decision to strip the Sussexes of their security, and Harry may potentially have to reimburse taxpayers’ legal costs. The judge dismissed Harry's claim of entitlement to a full risk analysis and stated that there was no procedural unfairness in the decision.