Prince Harry's Phone Hacking Case: Landmark Ruling and Call for Prosecutions

TL;DR Summary
In the recent phone hacking ruling, evidence presented in court suggests that former Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan was aware of phone hacking practices at Mirror Group Newspapers. While not all allegations against Morgan have been proven, testimonies from witnesses and evidence linking him to discussions about hacked voicemails raise questions about his involvement. The judge also found that other editors and executives at the Mirror Group were aware of hacking, but failed to report it to the board. Morgan denies any involvement in phone hacking and claims that no actual evidence has been produced against him.
- Piers Morgan and hacking: What the Prince Harry case heard BBC.com
- Prince Harry's Phone Was Hacked by U.K. Tabloid, Judge Rules in Landmark Case The New York Times
- London Police to 'Carefully Consider' Prince Harry Phone Hacking Ruling U.S. News & World Report
- UK court rules Prince Harry was victim of phone hacking by tabloid group CNN
- Top judge says anyone who lied to phone hacking inquiry should be prosecuted The Independent
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
5 min
vs 6 min read
Condensed
90%
1,020 → 97 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on BBC.com