Judge Denies Navarro's Executive Privilege Claim, Clearing Path for Contempt Trial

TL;DR Summary
A federal judge has rejected former White House adviser Peter Navarro's claim of executive privilege, clearing the way for his trial on criminal contempt charges for ignoring subpoenas from the House Jan. 6 committee. Navarro had argued that former President Donald Trump had invoked executive privilege, but the judge found no evidence to support this claim. The judge emphasized that executive privilege is an extraordinary assertion of power and must be made by the president or an authorized representative after personal consideration. Navarro's trial is set to begin next week.
- Judge rejects former Trump aide Peter Navarro's executive privilege claim, paving way for trial in contempt case NBC News
- Judge knocks out key defense for former Trump adviser Navarro ahead of contempt of Congress trial CNN
- Judge rejects Navarro's 'executive privilege' claim for defying Jan. 6 committee POLITICO
- Judge says former Trump adviser Peter Navarro has failed to show Trump asserted executive privilege ABC News
- Judge says Peter Navarro can't use privilege as defense in contempt case The Washington Post
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
2 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
82%
488 → 90 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on NBC News