Trump's Unconstitutional Gag Orders and Deranged Behavior in Fraud Trial

TL;DR Summary
The ACLU has filed an amicus brief supporting Donald Trump, arguing that the gag order imposed on him in his federal election subversion case is unconstitutional. The order, issued by Judge Tanya Chutkan, limits what Trump can say about the prosecution of his alleged attempt to overturn the 2020 election results. The ACLU acknowledges the harm caused by Trump's false statements but asserts his First Amendment right to speak and the public's right to hear. Trump has appealed the order, and the ACLU's brief aims to provide context and remind the judge of the potential historic implications of the ruling.
Topics:top-news#aclu#donald-trump#federal-election-subversion-case#first-amendment#gag-order#law-and-politics
- ACLU argues Trump gag order in federal election subversion case is unconstitutional CNN
- BREAKING: Trump takes stand in fraud trial, fined $10K for violating gag order MSNBC
- October 25, 2023 - Trump fined for violating gag order in civil fraud trial after taking stand CNN
- Trump's Deranged Behavior in New York Fraud Trial Will Make Him Lose Bigly The Daily Beast
- Opinion | How the Trump Gag Orders Could Backfire POLITICO
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
2 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
80%
489 → 100 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CNN