"Judge Questions Trump's Delay Tactics in Hush Money Case"

The judge overseeing the hush money criminal case involving former President Donald Trump in New York appeared skeptical of delaying or dismissing the case due to a dispute over potential evidence. The defense accused the Manhattan district attorney's office of misconduct and sought a dismissal, trial adjournment, and prohibition on key witnesses testifying. The trial, initially set for jury selection, was adjourned for 30 days after defense attorneys raised issues with the late production of over 100,000 pages of potential evidence by federal prosecutors. The defense argued for a longer delay, while prosecutors claimed the new evidence was a "red herring" and part of a "strategic delay." Defense lawyers have demanded a dismissal of the case based on the new materials, which they said damage the credibility of star witness Michael Cohen and contain exculpatory information.
- Judge appears skeptical of delaying, dismissing Trump hush money case ABC News
- Live updates: Hearing on new evidence in Trump N.Y. hush money case The Washington Post
- Here’s what happens if Trump can’t get a $464 million bond CNN
- Hush Money Trial Judge Pokes Holes in Trump's Delay Bid The Daily Beast
- Judge rips Trump team allegations over document dump in hush money case: Live updates The Hill
Reading Insights
0
1
5 min
vs 7 min read
89%
1,216 → 136 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on ABC News