"Judge Defends Questioning Potential Perjury in Trump Civil Fraud Trial"

The judge overseeing the New York attorney general’s civil fraud case against Donald Trump defended his questioning of a potential guilty plea by a long-time ally of Trump, stating that allegations of impartiality are baseless. The judge is considering whether to factor in the possible perjury admission by former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg, as reported by news outlets, into his decision, expected this month. Trump's lawyers argue it would be improper for the judge to consider non-evidence, while the attorney general's office urges a prompt ruling. The judge pushed back on suggestions that he would rely on news reports, stating he will research the law if Weisselberg pleads guilty and defending his right to inquire about potential perjury.
- Trump civil fraud trial judge defends questioning potential perjury from witness CNN
- New York AG and Trump lawyers tell judge they don’t want to wait for civil fraud verdict CNN
- Trump fraud trial: A little perjury is "hardly surprising," NY says Business Insider
- Trump’s Former CFO, Allen Weisselberg, in Negotiations Over Perjury Plea The New York Times
- Trump legal news brief: Judge Engoron says Trump's bias claims are 'getting old' Yahoo News
Reading Insights
0
1
1 min
vs 2 min read
65%
337 → 119 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CNN