Jack Daniel's Wins Trademark Battle Over Dog Toy in Supreme Court

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Jack Daniel's in a lawsuit against a company that sells a dog toy resembling the whiskey bottle. The court found that the toy is a trademark violation and threw out an appeal that found it to be a "non-commercial" parody. The case is now back to lower courts. The whiskey makers argued that the toy was profiting from their goodwill and confusing consumers. The decision is the second intellectual property law that the court has ruled on in recent months.
- Supreme Court backs Jack Daniel's in dog toy row BBC
- Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel’s in poop-themed dog toy trademark fight CNN
- Supreme Court Rules Against Dog Toy Resembling Liquor Bottle The New York Times
- U.S. Supreme Court rules for Jack Daniel's in fight over parody dog toy Yahoo Finance
- Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in trademark dispute with dog toy maker NPR
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
2 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
81%
460 → 89 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on BBC