"Harvard's Response to Plagiarism Allegations: Rigorous Review and Defense"

Harvard University submitted an eight-page summary to Congress detailing its rigorous review process of plagiarism allegations against former president Claudine Gay, ultimately determining that her conduct did not constitute research misconduct. The summary aimed to address concerns about transparency and process, following allegations of plagiarism made against Gay. The university's review process included appointing an independent panel and using a software program to locate potentially duplicative language in Gay's work. Harvard also clarified that it would not be involved in handling further allegations of misconduct against Gay, as she is no longer president.
- Harvard responds to Congress, details 'rigor' reviewing plagiarism allegations against Claudine Gay Fox News
- Harvard gives more detail of review of Claudine Gay plagiarism allegations The Washington Post
- ‘Code words and dog whistling’: why the conservative attack on higher education is so efficient The Guardian
- Palestine, the alchemy of big lies and future of the university Al Jazeera English
- Harvard Defends Its Plagiarism Investigation of Its Former President The New York Times
Reading Insights
0
0
6 min
vs 7 min read
93%
1,252 → 93 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Fox News