'ComEd Four' Verdict Sends Strong Message Against Bribery in Illinois Politics

1 min read
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
'ComEd Four' Verdict Sends Strong Message Against Bribery in Illinois Politics
Photo: Chicago Sun-Times
TL;DR Summary

Jurors in the ComEd bribery trial did not believe the defense's argument that the jobs and money that went to allies of Michael Madigan were just legal lobbying. The jury foreperson said they felt the allegations went beyond goodwill to "intent to influence." While jurors agreed that lobbying is necessary for legislators to be educated, they did not believe this was lobbying. The guilty verdict was delivered for four former political power players for arranging jobs, contracts, and money for Madigan's allies to influence him as crucial legislation moved through Springfield.

Share this article

Reading Insights

Total Reads

0

Unique Readers

1

Time Saved

4 min

vs 5 min read

Condensed

89%

86391 words

Want the full story? Read the original article

Read on Chicago Sun-Times