'ComEd Four' Verdict Sends Strong Message Against Bribery in Illinois Politics

TL;DR Summary
Jurors in the ComEd bribery trial did not believe the defense's argument that the jobs and money that went to allies of Michael Madigan were just legal lobbying. The jury foreperson said they felt the allegations went beyond goodwill to "intent to influence." While jurors agreed that lobbying is necessary for legislators to be educated, they did not believe this was lobbying. The guilty verdict was delivered for four former political power players for arranging jobs, contracts, and money for Madigan's allies to influence him as crucial legislation moved through Springfield.
- ComEd jurors say they didn't believe the jobs and money that went to Madigan allies were just legal lobbying Chicago Sun-Times
- Former federal prosecutor talks 'ComEd Four' found guilty in bribery trial WGN News
- 'ComEd 4' guilty on all counts in bribery trial CBS Chicago
- Defendants found guilty on all counts in 'ComEd Four' trial; juror says panel wanted 'politics to run in a correct manner' Chicago Tribune
- Guilty verdicts in ComEd bribery trial are a bad omen for Mike Madigan, but a good sign for Illinois Chicago Sun-Times
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
89%
863 → 91 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Chicago Sun-Times