"Climate Scientist Michael Mann's Defamation Lawsuit Reaches Verdict"

TL;DR Summary
Famed climate scientist Michael Mann is in a high-profile court case accusing right-wing bloggers of defamation, alleging they falsely accused him of academic fraud and likened him to a convicted child molester. The case, which took 12 years to get to trial, has implications for free speech and how scientists communicate to the public. Mann's "hockey stick chart" showcasing the effects of burning fossil fuels has made him a target of conservatives, leading to emotional distress and threats. The defense argues that the blog posts did not have a significant impact, while Mann continues to defend his work and engage in public discourse on climate science.
Topics:nation#climate-science#climate-science-legal#court-case#defamation#first-amendment#michael-mann
- Michael Mann, prominent climate scientist, gets his day in court The Washington Post
- Jury to decide on climate scientist Michael Mann's defamation suit over comparison to molester The Associated Press
- Climate scientist Michael Mann is suing for defamation in court NPR
- After 12 Years, Michael Mann’s Defamation Case against Mark Steyn Finally Goes to the Jury National Review
- One Mann’s Opinion Daily Telegraph
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
7 min
vs 8 min read
Condensed
93%
1,572 → 106 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Washington Post