Kiefer Sutherland's 'Rabbit Hole' struggles to hold together in messy espionage series.

TL;DR Summary
Paramount+’s new financial espionage thriller Rabbit Hole attempts to bring together different versions of Kiefer Sutherland’s performances, but fails to create a coherent show. The first two episodes are bad, but the third and fourth episodes are an improvement due to the arrival of Charles Dance. The show is ineffective as a ’70s thriller and misguided as an attempt to cover the same terrain as shows like Billions and Mr. Robot. However, as a Coen Brothers knockoff, it’s okay, especially in the third and fourth episodes.
Topics:entertainment#charles-dance#espionage-thriller#kiefer-sutherland#paramount#rabbit-hole#television
- ‘Rabbit Hole’ Review: Kiefer Sutherland Struggles to Hold Together Paramount+’s Messy Espionage Series Hollywood Reporter
- 'Rabbit Hole' Review: Kiefer Sutherland, Corporate Fixer The Wall Street Journal
- The Power to Rabbit Hole: the seven best shows to stream this week The Guardian
- Kiefer Sutherland on ‘Rabbit Hole’ and Looking Back at ‘The Lost Boys’ Hollywood Reporter
- In the Long, Paranoid Shadow of ‘24’ The New York Times
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
6 min
vs 7 min read
Condensed
94%
1,325 → 86 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Hollywood Reporter