UMG Defends Lyrics Context in Drake Case, Calls Appeal Hypocritical

TL;DR Summary
UMG has filed an 83-page brief in the Second Circuit arguing Drake’s bid to revive his defamation suit over Kendrick Lamar’s 'Not Like Us' is illogical and hypocritical, insisting Lamar’s lyrics were nonactionable opinion and that Drake seeks a harsher standard for lyric-based statements; Drake originally sued UMG in Jan 2025, claiming the label promoted the track to spread a false claim that he is a pedophile, but a district court ruled the lyrics were hyperbolic and not factual. The case tests how defamation law applies to rap lyrics and whether context can shield artists from liability.
- Drake’s Label Fires Back at Rapper in Appeals Court: ‘Astoundingly Hypocritical’ rollingstone.com
- UMG Blasts Drake Appeal in Lawsuit Over Kendrick Lamar’s ‘Not Like Us’: ‘That Is Not the Law’ Billboard
- UMG Responds to Drake Appeal, Says He's Trying To 'Critically Undermine' Rap Because He Lost Beef Complex
- Payola Controlla: How Drake and UMG’s Settlement Highlights the New Music Economy NYU Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law
- Drake sues Universal Music for defamation related to Kendrick Lamar ‘diss’ track shropshirestar.com
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
3
Time Saved
17 min
vs 18 min read
Condensed
97%
3,526 → 97 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on rollingstone.com