US Court Rules AI-Generated Art Cannot Be Copyrighted, Impacting Hollywood Studios

A U.S. court in Washington, D.C., has ruled that artworks created solely by artificial intelligence (AI) without any human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law. The court affirmed the Copyright Office's rejection of an application filed by computer scientist Stephen Thaler on behalf of his AI system, DABUS. The decision follows previous losses for Thaler in his bids for U.S. patents covering inventions created by DABUS. Thaler's attorney plans to appeal the decision, while the Copyright Office believes the court reached the correct result. The case highlights the emerging challenges in copyright law as artists incorporate AI into their creative process.
- AI-generated art cannot receive copyrights, US court says Reuters
- AI-generated art can't be copyrighted, federal judge rules Business Insider
- US judge: Art created solely by artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted Ars Technica
- Federal judge says AI-generated art can't be copyrighted in ruling that may impact Hollywood studios Salon
Reading Insights
0
1
2 min
vs 3 min read
77%
438 → 102 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Reuters