Navigating the Complexities of Generative AI and Copyright Law

TL;DR Summary
The rise of generative AI has raised questions about ownership and authorship. The generative ability of AI is the result of training them with scores of prior artworks, from which the AI learns how to create artistic outputs. This has led to questions about whether the artists whose art was scraped to train the models should be compensated, who owns the images that AI systems produce, and whether the process of fine-tuning prompts for generative AI is a form of authentic creative expression. The ways in which existing laws are interpreted or reformed will have real consequences for the future of creative expression.
- Generative AI is a minefield for copyright law The Conversation
- How should we regulate generative AI, and what will happen if we fail? Euronews
- Pieter Abbeel and Ken Goldberg on generative AI applications TechCrunch
- Are Public or Proprietary AI Solutions Right for Your Business? Interview With Expert Aaron Kalb TechRepublic
- Generative AI will enhance human potential, not replace it, KPMG exec says Arab News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
6 min
vs 7 min read
Condensed
92%
1,225 → 103 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Conversation