Accurate AI, Missing Pieces: Why Law Needs Reliable Patent-Search Infrastructure

TL;DR Summary
The piece argues that AI used in legal patent search can be accurate yet incomplete if it lacks scalable, reliable recall across hundreds of millions of documents. Melange, aided by Pinecone, demonstrates that infrastructure—not just model quality—limits unseen 'unknown unknowns' that can miss crucial prior art, potentially inflating litigation costs. Building a robust retrieval backbone is essential to prevent costly missteps in high-stakes patent cases.
- Legal AI Might Be Accurate… And Still Not *Right* Above the Law
- Are more clients turning to artificial intelligence for legal advice? ABA Journal
- The jurisprudence of algorithms: Navigating the ethical frontier of AI-driven legal visibility London Daily News
- ‘My journey from marine biology to practicing AI governance at a global law firm’ Legal Cheek
- Arbitrators Take Cautious Approach To Integrating AI Law360
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
6
Time Saved
4 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
92%
786 → 65 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Above the Law